Many think creative financing involves complex, difficult strategies; however, it simply means finding an alternate way to solve financial problems. When faced with a challenge to finance a property, always use a simple solution.
In a previous article in this series, we discussed the importance of putting together an easy-to-understand loan-request package. With this package, you may get the best (and cheapest) financing available, whether your source is a traditional lender, like a bank, or a private lender.
There are situations, however, in which traditional financing is not available (or not practical), and an investor has to be very creative just to get the deal done. In this series of articles on creative financing, we will discuss numerous methods and techniques to get a property financed. The more methods you understand, the easier it will be to find solutions to sellers’ problems
Utilizing creative financing requires one to think outside the box for solutions that satisfy both the buyer’s and the seller’s needs. There are many places you can go to get help with financing for a property, other than a traditional lender. You may incorporate any one, or a combination of sources, in order to fund a project. With your own creativity, you will be able to add to the following list:
Sources of Creative Funding
• Other investors
• Partners
• Hard-money lenders
• The property itself
• The seller
• The realtor (if one is involved)
• The buyer
• The renters (if it is an existing rental property)
• Options and leases
• Underlying mortgages
• Special first-time home-buyer programs
• Down-payment assistance programs (for those who qualify)
• Your rehab contractor
• Your local city, county, or state government (special loan programs)
• Government grants
• Private grants (for special projects)
• Relatives or friends
This is not a complete list by any means, but it should give you a few ideas.
One of the most popular ways to finance a property (other than through a traditional lender) is to use the seller as a source of funding. If the buyer/investor has done his selection job well, he/she will be dealing with motivated sellers who will most likely be flexible with financing arrangements, as long as their needs are met. If the investor is in tune with the seller’s situation, they can develop a trusting relationship with the seller. The investor can then educate the seller as to the advantages of seller financing, and suggest ways to set up the financing that will create a win-win situation.
Here are a few ways that the seller can get involved in the financing:
1. Seller Funds the Whole Deal
If the seller owns a property free and clear, they can carry a mortgage for the entire purchase price of the property. This allows investors to get into the property for only enough money to cover their share of the closing costs. A sweet deal if you can get it! However, the investor may have to come up with some down payment. The amount would most likely be proportional to the amount of trust the seller has in the investor. Listen to the seller and find out what the needs really are and try to meet them.
Many times, especially for older sellers, the need is for a steady monthly cash flow and not for a lump sum of cash. Once they understand that it can be to their advantage to become the bank and they trust you, the deal is done. The buyer makes one mortgage payment directly to the seller. No banks involved.
2. Seller Funds Part of the Deal by Carrying a Second Mortgage
In the case where the seller has a mortgage on the property, but also has some equity, the seller may be willing to help with the financing by carrying a second mortgage on the property. For example, if an investor offers $200,000 for a property and the seller has a $100,000 first mortgage, the seller may be willing to finance all or part of their $100,000 equity by creating a new mortgage that will be in second position.
The buyer would obtain traditional financing in the amount of $100,000 to pay off the first mortgage. The seller would get a note (secured by the property) instead of cash at closing. If the seller is willing to carry all $100,000 dollars on a note, the investor would have close to a nothing-down deal. He may have to come up with money for closing and financing costs. Or the seller may require a down payment for enough to pay the closing costs and a real estate broker fee, if a real estate agent is involved in the transaction. Always ask for a 100 percent second – you just might get it. In this case, the buyer would be making two payments – one to the bank for the new first mortgage and one to the seller for his $100,000 2nd mortgage note.
3. Seller Funds Part of the Deal by “Wrapping” the First Mortgage
If the seller is willing to create a note and take payments for their equity, but the buyer can’t get a new first mortgage (or doesn’t want to go to the expense of getting a new first mortgage), the seller can create a new note for the entire purchase amount that “wraps” the existing first mortgage.
In states using trust deeds, an all-inclusive deed of trust is the document that is used to create a wrap mortgage. As in the previous example, if the investor is paying $200,000 for the property and there is an existing first mortgage of $100,000, a new note would be created for $200,000, payable to the seller. But the note and mortgage documents would indicate that there is already a $100,000 mortgage on the property. The payment on the new $200,000 note would be based on the interest rate and term negotiated. The buyer would make one payment to the seller, but the seller would have to take part of those funds and make the payment on the first mortgage. The prudent investor would set up payments going to an escrow company that would make the payment to the bank and send the balance of the payment to the seller.
The wrap mortgage benefits both the buyer and the seller. The buyer saves the origination expense of getting the new loan and usually gets an interest rate lower than he could get at the bank and gets into the deal for nothing down. The seller gets a quick closing (no waiting for any loans to be approved). If he’s smart, he will set up the interest rate on the new note to be higher than the interest rate on his original first mortgage. Thus, he will not only make interest on his equity, but make interest on the spread between the new note and the bank mortgage interest rates. This can be a great selling point to get the seller to accept the wrap-mortgage concept.
4. Seller Takes Second and Third, Keeps Third and Sells Second
In this situation, the seller wants some cash, or wants more cash than the buyer has to offer. For example, let’s say a buyer offers $200,000 for a home that has an existing $100,000 mortgage. The seller is willing to carry a second mortgage, but wants a minimum of $20,000 cash. The investor could get a new $100,000 first mortgage and then just pay the $20,000 and have the seller carry a note for $80,000.
What if the investor doesn’t have the $20,000? Is the deal dead? No. If you are dealing with a motivated seller, suggest that two notes be created –one for $25,000 and one for $75,000. The $25,000 note would be in a second position and the $75,000 note would be in a third position.
The $25,000 could be sold to a note buyer for $20,000, giving the seller the required $20,000. The seller would be getting $5000 less for the property but would be getting their $20,000 cash from the deal. The investor would now be making three payments, one to the bank for the new $100,000 loan that paid off the original first mortgage, one to the note buyer for the $25,000 second mortgage, and one to the seller for their $75,000 third position note.
For ease of management, payments could be set up through an escrow company, so that the buyer would only have to make one payment to the escrow company who would in turn pay the three mortgage holders. Second-position seller carry-back notes can be sold for less of a discount than third position notes; thus, the second position note was sold in this case.
5. Seller Carries a Second Position Note with a Balloon Payment
So far we have used examples where sellers were willing to carry notes that were fully amortized over the negotiated term of the loan with no balloon payments attached. But many times, sellers may be willing to carry notes, but not for 20 to 30 years. They may be willing to accept payments based on a 30-year amortization period, but they want the full balance to be paid off in a shorter period of time. This becomes another negotiating point in structuring the deal.
The seller may want a balloon payment of the entire balance in say, three to five years. This means that the buyer would have to sell the property or refinance in three to five years. Short balloons like these create high risk for the buyer/investor. Try to avoid balloon payments altogether, but if a balloon is the only way to save the deal, try to get at least seven to ten years before the balloon is due. Longer balloons give you more flexibility in finding the best long-term financing for a rental or give you a more saleable property if you sell and let your new buyer assume the existing seller financing.
6. Graduated Payments as an Alternative to a Balloon
Suppose you buy a property to keep for a long-term rental. The seller is willing to carry a note for some or all of the equity, but wants a balloon payment down the road. You may be able to eliminate the balloon (or at least reduce the balloon payment amount) by negotiating graduated payments into the deal.
For example, if the seller carries a note for $100,000 at six percent interest, amortized over 30 years, the payment for principal and interest would be $599.55 per month. If the seller insists on a five-year balloon payment, the payoff in five years would be $93,054.36. Now if you had to refinance for that amount to pay the balloon in five years, could you do it? Maybe, but it also might be a foreclosure just waiting to happen. Instead of taking the risk of a short-term balloon, why not try to negotiate graduated payments. Payments could go up $50 a month in the second year and subsequent years, the normal payment of $599.55 per month the first year, then $649.55 per month the second year, and so on. The increased rents should take care of the increased payments.
If you could get the sellers to take the graduated payments and put off the balloon till year 10, then the payments would be $1099.55 per month. The balloon payments due would now be only around $50,000. This is a more manageable amount to refinance, even if the property hadn’t increased a lot in value. This deal is much less risky for the investor.
As you can see, there are many different ways to structure a deal. The key is finding out what the seller really needs out of the deal and being creative in giving them what they want. Of course, the numbers have to make sense to start with and allow the investor to make a profit from a quick sale or a positive cash flow from a rental. The more creative techniques you are familiar with, the easier it will be to successfully negotiate a winning deal for all parties involved. We will discuss additional creative financing techniques in future articles in this series.